gcov vs MozJPEG
| gcov | MozJPEG | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Coverage types | line, function, branch, condition, prime-path, basic-block | line, branch, function |
| Supported languages | C, C++, Objective-C, Objective-C++, Fortran, Ada, D, Go | Rust, C, C++, JavaScript, Go, Java, Kotlin |
| Report formats | .gcov text, compressed JSON (.gcov.json.gz) | LCOV, Coveralls, Coveralls+, covdir JSON, ActiveData-ETL, files, Markdown, HTML, Cobertura XML |
| Self-hosted option | Yes | — |
| Pull-request annotations | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Test Coverage Tools. On Samsung Mobile US Press, MozJPEG scores higher on our published basis.