Gardener vs Komodor
| Gardener | Komodor | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, self-hosted, Web | Web |
| Control plane management | vendor-managed | — |
| Supported environments | Alibaba Cloud, AWS, Azure, Equinix Metal, GCP, Hetzner Cloud, IronCore, KubeVirt, metal-stack, OpenStack, STACKIT, vSphere | Self-managed Kubernetes, EKS, GKE, AKS, on-premises, Komodor Managed Cloud |
| Cluster provisioning | Yes | — |
| Multi-cluster management | Yes | Yes |
| Policy enforcement | Yes | Yes |
| Upgrade management | Yes | Yes |
| Free plan | — | No |
Both are listed in Best Kubernetes Management Platforms. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Gardener scores higher on our published basis.