FossID Workbench vs OSS Review Toolkit
| FossID Workbench | OSS Review Toolkit | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Web, Linux | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows |
| Supported ecosystems | JavaScript (NPM, Bower, PNPM, Yarn), Java/Kotlin (Maven, Gradle, Ivy, Kotlin), Python (PIP, Pipenv, Poetry, Hatch), Rust/Cargo, Dart/Flutter, PHP/Composer, Ruby/Bundler, Go, C/C++/Conan, CocoaPods/Swift, Yocto, Soong, Elixir, Haskell, .NET, SBT | Bazel, Conan, Pub, Mix, Rebar3, Gleam, Go Modules, Stack, Gradle, Maven, Tycho, Bower, Bun, NPM, PNPM, Yarn, .NET, NuGet, Carthage, CocoaPods, Swift Package Manager, Composer, PIP, Pipenv, Poetry, Bundler, Cargo, SBT, SPDX, ORT Project, Unmanaged |
| SBOM generation | Yes | Yes |
| Pull request scanning | Yes | — |
| Deployment options | hybrid | self_hosted |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software, Best Open Source License Compliance Software, Best Dependency Management Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, OSS Review Toolkit scores higher on our published basis.