FossID Workbench vs lockhawk
| FossID Workbench | lockhawk | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Web, Linux | — |
| Supported ecosystems | JavaScript (NPM, Bower, PNPM, Yarn), Java/Kotlin (Maven, Gradle, Ivy, Kotlin), Python (PIP, Pipenv, Poetry, Hatch), Rust/Cargo, Dart/Flutter, PHP/Composer, Ruby/Bundler, Go, C/C++/Conan, CocoaPods/Swift, Yocto, Soong, Elixir, Haskell, .NET, SBT | npm, Yarn, pnpm |
| SBOM generation | Yes | No |
| Pull request scanning | Yes | — |
| Deployment options | hybrid | self_hosted |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Reachability analysis | — | No |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, FossID Workbench scores higher on our published basis.