FOSSA vs Sonatype Nexus Repository
Sonatype Nexus Repository
6.4 #4 in Software Composition Analysis Software
About Sonatype Nexus Repository| FOSSA | Sonatype Nexus Repository | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | $168392.50/mo | $162.50/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, self-hosted, Web | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Supported ecosystems | JavaScript/TypeScript, Java/Kotlin, Python, Go, Ruby, Rust, Clojure, Elixir, iOS/Objective-C/Swift, .NET, PHP, Dart, Erlang, Fortran, Haskell, Perl | C++/Conan; Conda; Dart and Flutter/pub; Go/Go Modules; Hugging Face; Java/Maven, Gradle, Ivy; JavaScript/npm, yarn; .NET/NuGet; Objective-C/CocoaPods; PHP/Composer; Python/PyPI, Poetry, pipenv; R/CRAN; RPM/Yum and Fedora EPEL; Ruby/RubyGems and Bundler; Rust/Cargo; Swift/Swift |
| SBOM generation | Yes | Yes |
| Reachability analysis | Yes | Yes |
| Pull request scanning | Yes | Yes |
| Monitored projects | 10 projects | — |
| Deployment options | hybrid | hybrid |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software, Best Dependency Management Software, Best SBOM Management Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Sonatype Nexus Repository scores higher on our published basis.