FOSSA vs OSS Review Toolkit
| FOSSA | OSS Review Toolkit | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | $168392.50/mo | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, self-hosted, Web | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Supported ecosystems | JavaScript/TypeScript, Java/Kotlin, Python, Go, Ruby, Rust, Clojure, Elixir, iOS/Objective-C/Swift, .NET, PHP, Dart, Erlang, Fortran, Haskell, Perl | Bazel, Conan, Pub, Mix, Rebar3, Gleam, Go Modules, Stack, Gradle, Maven, Tycho, Bower, Bun, NPM, PNPM, Yarn, .NET, NuGet, Carthage, CocoaPods, Swift Package Manager, Composer, PIP, Pipenv, Poetry, Bundler, Cargo, SBT, SPDX, ORT Project, Unmanaged |
| SBOM generation | Yes | Yes |
| Reachability analysis | Yes | — |
| Pull request scanning | Yes | — |
| Monitored projects | 10 projects | — |
| Deployment options | hybrid | self_hosted |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software, Best Open Source License Compliance Software, Best Dependency Management Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, FOSSA scores higher on our published basis.