FOSSA vs Grype
| FOSSA | Grype | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | $168392.50/mo | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, self-hosted, Web | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Supported ecosystems | JavaScript/TypeScript, Java/Kotlin, Python, Go, Ruby, Rust, Clojure, Elixir, iOS/Objective-C/Swift, .NET, PHP, Dart, Erlang, Fortran, Haskell, Perl | Alpine, Debian, Ubuntu, RHEL, SUSE, Amazon Linux, PyPI, npm, Maven, Go modules, Composer, NuGet, Pub, RubyGems, Crates, Swift, GitHub Actions, Bitnami, Conda, WordPress plugins |
| SBOM generation | Yes | Yes |
| Reachability analysis | Yes | — |
| Pull request scanning | Yes | — |
| Monitored projects | 10 projects | — |
| Deployment options | hybrid | self_hosted |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, FOSSA scores higher on our published basis.