fio vs UL Procyon
| fio | UL Procyon | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows | Windows, macOS, Android |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Workload areas | sequential reads/writes; random reads/writes; mixed read/write; trim operations; bandwidth; IOPS; submission, completion, and total latency | office productivity, photo editing, video editing, battery life, AI computer vision, AI image generation, AI text generation, multitasking and web browsing |
| Operating systems | Linux; Windows; macOS | Windows, macOS, Android |
| Result export formats | normal text; CSV (terse); JSON; JSON+ | XML, PDF, CSV, Procyon result file |
| Custom test profiles | Yes | Yes |
| CLI or automation | Yes | Yes |
| Comparison database | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best PC Benchmark Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, UL Procyon scores higher on our published basis.