fido2-lib vs SenseCrypt
| fido2-lib | SenseCrypt | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | Free | $1/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, self-hosted | Android, api, iOS, self-hosted, Web |
| Deployment model | self-hosted | hybrid |
| Supported platforms | Node.js, Deno, web browsers using WebAuthn | web; Android; iOS; API; self-hosted infrastructure |
| SDK languages | JavaScript | JavaScript/TypeScript; Python |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Paid from | — | 1 /user/mo |
| Biometric methods | — | facial recognition; liveness detection |
| Audit logs | — | Yes |
| Included users | — | 20 users |
Both are listed in Best Biometric Authentication Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, SenseCrypt scores higher on our published basis.