F5 BIG-IP Container Ingress Services vs LiteSpeed Ingress Controller
F5 BIG-IP Container Ingress Services
6.5 #12 in Kubernetes Ingress Controllers
About F5 BIG-IP Container Ingress ServicesLiteSpeed Ingress Controller
6.5 #11 in Kubernetes Ingress Controllers
About LiteSpeed Ingress Controller| F5 BIG-IP Container Ingress Services | LiteSpeed Ingress Controller | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | Free | $59.58/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, self-hosted | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web |
| Ingress API model | ingress | both |
| Canary routing | Yes | Yes |
| Web application firewall | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment model | self-hosted | self-hosted |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Paid from | — | 65 /mo |
| TLS automation | — | Yes |
| Rate limiting | — | Yes |
| Auth policies | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Kubernetes Ingress Controllers. On Samsung Mobile US Press, F5 BIG-IP Container Ingress Services scores higher on our published basis.