EclEmma vs Istanbul
| EclEmma | Istanbul | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Coverage types | instruction, branch, line, method, type, cyclomatic complexity | line, statement, function, branch |
| Supported languages | Java, Scala | JavaScript, TypeScript |
| Report formats | HTML, XML, CSV, JaCoCo execution data (.exec) | text, HTML, lcov |
| Pull-request annotations | — | No |
| Coverage gates | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Test Coverage Tools. On Samsung Mobile US Press, EclEmma scores higher on our published basis.