Eazfuscator.NET vs ProGuard
| Eazfuscator.NET | ProGuard | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Windows, Linux, macOS | Android, Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Supported targets | .NET 5.0-11.0; .NET Standard 1.0-2.1; .NET Core 1.0-3.1; .NET Framework 2.0-4.8.1; XAML/WPF/MAUI/UWP; Unity/MonoGame/XNA; Mono/Xamarin | Java, Kotlin, Android |
| Control-flow obfuscation | Yes | — |
| String encryption | Yes | — |
| Deployment model | desktop | desktop |
| Build integration | plugin | cli |
| Anti-tamper controls | — | No |
Both are listed in Best Code Obfuscation Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, ProGuard scores higher on our published basis.