dotCover vs Tarpaulin
| dotCover | Tarpaulin | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | $50.75/mo | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Coverage types | statement, unit-test, application/manual | line |
| Supported languages | C#, F#, VB.NET | Rust |
| Report formats | HTML, XML, JSON, XML for NDepend | JSON, stdout, XML, HTML, LCOV |
| Pull-request annotations | — | Yes |
| Self-hosted option | — | Yes |
| Historical trends | — | Yes |
| Coverage gates | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Test Coverage Tools. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Tarpaulin scores higher on our published basis.