DepWarden vs OSS Review Toolkit
| DepWarden | OSS Review Toolkit | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | $19/mo | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Supported ecosystems | npm, PyPI, Maven, Gradle, Go, RubyGems, Cargo, NuGet, Composer, Dart (Pub), Swift | Bazel, Conan, Pub, Mix, Rebar3, Gleam, Go Modules, Stack, Gradle, Maven, Tycho, Bower, Bun, NPM, PNPM, Yarn, .NET, NuGet, Carthage, CocoaPods, Swift Package Manager, Composer, PIP, Pipenv, Poetry, Bundler, Cargo, SBT, SPDX, ORT Project, Unmanaged |
| SBOM generation | Yes | Yes |
| Reachability analysis | No | — |
| Pull request scanning | Yes | — |
| Deployment options | hybrid | self_hosted |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, OSS Review Toolkit scores higher on our published basis.