DepWarden vs OpenSCA
| DepWarden | OpenSCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Web | extension, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Supported ecosystems | npm, PyPI, Maven, Gradle, Go, RubyGems, Cargo, NuGet, Composer, Dart (Pub), Swift | Java/Maven, Java/Gradle, JavaScript/NPM, PHP/Composer, Ruby/gem, Golang/Go mod, Rust/cargo, Erlang/Rebar, Python/Pip |
| SBOM generation | Yes | Yes |
| Reachability analysis | No | — |
| Pull request scanning | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment options | hybrid | hybrid |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, OpenSCA scores higher on our published basis.