DepWarden vs FossID Workbench
| DepWarden | FossID Workbench | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | $19/mo | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows | Web, Linux |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Supported ecosystems | npm, PyPI, Maven, Gradle, Go, RubyGems, Cargo, NuGet, Composer, Dart (Pub), Swift | JavaScript (NPM, Bower, PNPM, Yarn), Java/Kotlin (Maven, Gradle, Ivy, Kotlin), Python (PIP, Pipenv, Poetry, Hatch), Rust/Cargo, Dart/Flutter, PHP/Composer, Ruby/Bundler, Go, C/C++/Conan, CocoaPods/Swift, Yocto, Soong, Elixir, Haskell, .NET, SBT |
| SBOM generation | Yes | Yes |
| Reachability analysis | No | — |
| Pull request scanning | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment options | hybrid | hybrid |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, DepWarden scores higher on our published basis.