CVE Binary Tool vs Scantist
| CVE Binary Tool | Scantist | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows | Web |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Supported ecosystems | Dart (pubspec.lock); Go (go.mod); Java (pom.xml, JAR/WAR/EAR); JavaScript (package-lock.json, yarn.lock); OpenWrt opkg (.control); Perl (cpanfile); Python (requirements.txt, PKG-INFO, METADATA, .whl, .egg); Rust (Cargo.lock); Ruby (Gemfile.lock); R (renv.lock); Swift (Package.resolved); Windows PE (.pyd) | Java, JavaScript, Perl, Go, Python, C#, C/C++, Ruby, PHP, Objective-C, Swift |
| SBOM generation | Yes | Yes |
| Pull request scanning | Yes | — |
| Deployment options | self_hosted | hybrid |
| Monitored projects | — | 100 projects |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Scantist scores higher on our published basis.