CUDA-GDB vs OpenOCD
| CUDA-GDB | OpenOCD | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Supported languages | C/C++, Fortran | — |
| Target platforms | Linux, QNX | ARM, MIPS, RISC-V, Xtensa, ARC, AVR32, DSP563xx, DSP5680xx, eSi-RISC, STM8 |
| Remote debugging | Yes | Yes |
| Conditional breakpoints | Yes | — |
| Core dump debugging | Yes | — |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Exception breakpoints | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Debuggers. On Samsung Mobile US Press, CUDA-GDB scores higher on our published basis.