CrystalDiskMark vs UL Procyon
| CrystalDiskMark | UL Procyon | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Windows | Windows, macOS, Android |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Paid from | 9.99 one-time | — |
| Workload areas | Sequential, random, read, write, mixed disk performance | office productivity, photo editing, video editing, battery life, AI computer vision, AI image generation, AI text generation, multitasking and web browsing |
| Operating systems | Windows XP/Vista/7/8/8.1/10/11; Windows Server 2003/2008/2012/2016/2019/2022/2025 | Windows, macOS, Android |
| Result export formats | UTF-16LE text with BOM, PNG, JPEG, BMP | XML, PDF, CSV, Procyon result file |
| Custom test profiles | Yes | Yes |
| Comparison database | — | Yes |
| CLI or automation | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best PC Benchmark Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, UL Procyon scores higher on our published basis.