ComplyVigilance SCA vs OpenSCA
| ComplyVigilance SCA | OpenSCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | €10/mo | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, self-hosted, Web | extension, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Supported ecosystems | npm, yarn, pip, PyPI, Poetry, Maven, Gradle, NuGet, Cargo, Go Modules, vcpkg, Conan, Pkg.jl, Hardhat, Truffle, Foundry, Docker Hub, OCI registries; C, C++, C#, Java, Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, Go, Rust, Solidity, Julia | Java/Maven, Java/Gradle, JavaScript/NPM, PHP/Composer, Ruby/gem, Golang/Go mod, Rust/cargo, Erlang/Rebar, Python/Pip |
| SBOM generation | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment options | cloud | hybrid |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Pull request scanning | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, ComplyVigilance SCA scores higher on our published basis.