CocoaPods vs opam
| CocoaPods | opam | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | iOS, macOS | Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Package formats | Pod, podspec | opam package definition files and archives |
| Supported platforms | iOS, macOS, tvOS, visionOS, watchOS | Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, Windows |
| Dependency resolution | Yes | Yes |
| Lockfile support | Yes | Yes |
| Workspace support | Yes | — |
| Offline installation | Yes | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Package Managers, Best Package Registries. On Samsung Mobile US Press, CocoaPods scores higher on our published basis.