Cinebench vs CrystalDiskMark
| Cinebench | CrystalDiskMark | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | macOS, Windows | Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Workload areas | CPU rendering; GPU rendering; ray tracing; shader execution; geometry processing; lighting; global illumination; scene complexity | Sequential, random, read, write, mixed disk performance |
| Operating systems | Windows; macOS | Windows XP/Vista/7/8/8.1/10/11; Windows Server 2003/2008/2012/2016/2019/2022/2025 |
| Result export formats | none documented; results are not saved as a file | UTF-16LE text with BOM, PNG, JPEG, BMP |
| Custom test profiles | Yes | Yes |
| CLI or automation | Yes | — |
| Paid from | — | 9.99 one-time |
Both are listed in Best PC Benchmark Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, CrystalDiskMark scores higher on our published basis.