Checkmarx SCA vs FossID Workbench
| Checkmarx SCA | FossID Workbench | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Linux |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Supported ecosystems | Java/Maven, JavaScript/TypeScript/NPM, .NET/NuGet, Python/PIP, PHP/Composer, Swift/iOS, Go, Ruby, C/C++/Conan, Unity, Perl/CPAN, Dart/Pub | JavaScript (NPM, Bower, PNPM, Yarn), Java/Kotlin (Maven, Gradle, Ivy, Kotlin), Python (PIP, Pipenv, Poetry, Hatch), Rust/Cargo, Dart/Flutter, PHP/Composer, Ruby/Bundler, Go, C/C++/Conan, CocoaPods/Swift, Yocto, Soong, Elixir, Haskell, .NET, SBT |
| SBOM generation | Yes | Yes |
| Reachability analysis | Yes | — |
| Pull request scanning | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment options | cloud | hybrid |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software, Best Dependency Management Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, FossID Workbench scores higher on our published basis.