Cato Client vs OpenVPN Access Server
| Cato Client | OpenVPN Access Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | — | $7/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Android, iOS, Linux, macOS, Windows | Android, iOS, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| SSO / SCIM | Yes | Yes |
| Device posture | Yes | Yes |
| Admin control level | advanced | enterprise |
| Access model | ztna | hybrid |
| Audit logs | Yes | Yes |
| Supported platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android | Linux server; Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, and ChromeOS clients; Docker; VMware ESXi; Microsoft Hyper-V; AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, IBM Cloud, DigitalOcean, Oracle Cloud, and Vultr |
| Paid from | — | $7/user/mo |
| Site-to-site networking | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Business VPN Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, OpenVPN Access Server scores higher on our published basis.