Carthage vs snapd
| Carthage | snapd | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | iOS, macOS | Linux |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Package formats | framework, xcframework | snap (.snap) |
| Supported platforms | macOS, iOS, tvOS, watchOS, visionOS | Linux distributions including Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, RHEL-family systems, openSUSE, Arch Linux, Manjaro, Gentoo, Solus, and Yocto-based systems |
| Dependency resolution | Yes | Yes |
| Lockfile support | Yes | — |
| Private registry auth | Yes | — |
| Offline installation | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Package Managers. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Carthage scores higher on our published basis.