Caretta vs Pixie
| Caretta | Pixie | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, self-hosted | Linux, self-hosted, Web |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment model | self-hosted | — |
| Kubernetes support | Yes | — |
| Network visibility | Yes | — |
| Supported operating systems | Linux kernel >= 4.16 with CO-RE support | — |
Both are listed in Best eBPF Observability Tools. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Caretta scores higher on our published basis.