Carbon Black Workload vs Sweet Security
| Carbon Black Workload | Sweet Security | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, Web, Windows | Linux, self-hosted, Web |
| Deployment model | agent-based | agent-based |
| Response actions | live query, live response, remediation, automatic de-provisioning | Terminate malicious processes; kill compromised containers; prevent pod scheduling; custom playbooks; webhooks |
| Supported host OS | Windows Server, Linux | Linux; Windows |
| Cloud platforms | Amazon Web Services | AWS; Google Cloud; Azure; private cloud |
| Container protection | — | Yes |
| Serverless protection | — | Yes |
| Kubernetes protection | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms, Best Cloud Detection and Response Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Sweet Security scores higher on our published basis.