ByteHide Shield vs Tigress
| ByteHide Shield | Tigress | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Android, iOS, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows | Android, Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Supported targets | .NET; JavaScript/TypeScript; Android Java/Kotlin; iOS Swift/Objective-C | C99 source; Linux, Darwin, Android, Windows; Intel and ARM; WebAssembly; GCC, Clang, Emscripten, and cl |
| Anti-tamper controls | Yes | Yes |
| Control-flow obfuscation | Yes | Yes |
| String encryption | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment model | hybrid | self_hosted |
| Build integration | plugin | cli |
Both are listed in Best Code Obfuscation Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, ByteHide Shield scores higher on our published basis.