button solutions Ad Protect vs Spider AF
| button solutions Ad Protect | Spider AF | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Paid from | 30 /mo | 120 /mo |
| Ad platforms supported | Google Ads; Meta Ads; Microsoft/Bing Ads (beta); Taboola Ads; LinkedIn Ads (beta); Reddit Ads (beta); TikTok Ads (coming soon); Generic UTM-tagged campaigns | Google, Yahoo, Criteo, RTBHouse, Taboola, Logicad, Meta, X (Twitter), LINE, TikTok, Pinterest, SmartNews, Microsoft Ads |
| Automatic click blocking | Yes | Yes |
| Detection methods | IP, TLS, HTTP, JavaScript signals | JavaScript tag device and session signals; lists; proprietary multiple-signal detection; GIVT and SIVT classification |
| Traffic reporting | — | advanced |
Both are listed in Best Click Fraud Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Spider AF scores higher on our published basis.