BullseyeCoverage vs gcovr
| BullseyeCoverage | gcovr | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows | Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Coverage types | function coverage; condition/decision coverage | line, branch, decision, function, condition, call |
| Supported languages | C; C++ | C, C++ |
| Report formats | HTML; text; annotated source code; XML; Cobertura; CSV | text, HTML, CSV, JSON, Markdown, Clover XML, Cobertura XML, Coveralls JSON, JaCoCo XML, LCOV, SonarQube XML |
| Coverage gates | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Test Coverage Tools. On Samsung Mobile US Press, gcovr scores higher on our published basis.