BS.Player vs foobar2000
| BS.Player | foobar2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | €19.90/mo | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Android, Windows | Android, iOS, Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Supported platforms | Windows, Android | Windows, macOS, Android, iOS; Linux via Wine |
| Network playback | Yes | Yes |
| Subtitle support | Yes | — |
| Format support | WebM, Xvid, AVI, MPG, MPEG-1, MPEG-2, MPEG-4, 3ivx, streaming video, AVCHD, MOV, RM, OGM, MKV, ASF, WMV, DV, M1V, M2V, MP4, MPV, SWF, VOB, WAV, MPA, MP1, MP2, MP3, Ogg, AAC, AIF, RAM, WMA, FLV | MP3, MP2, MP1, M4A/AAC/Apple Lossless, Ogg Vorbis, Opus, Musepack, Speex, AC3, DTS, WMA, FLAC/Ogg FLAC, WavPack, Monkey's Audio, TAK, WAV, Wave64, RF64, AIFF, AU/SND, Matroska/WebM, MPEG Transport Stream, Audio CD, HLS radio |
| Hardware acceleration | Yes | — |
| License model | one-time | free |
Both are listed in Best Media Player Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, BS.Player scores higher on our published basis.