BrightstarDB vs Corese
| BrightstarDB | Corese | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Windows, Linux, macOS, iOS, Android | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment options | self-hosted | self-hosted |
| SPARQL support | sparql 1.1 | sparql 1.1 |
| Supported RDF formats | N-Triples, N-Quads, RDF/XML, Turtle, RDF/JSON, N3, TriX | RDF/XML, Turtle, TriG, JSON-LD, N-Triples, N-Quads, RDFa |
| Reasoning support | — | Yes |
| RDF-star support | — | Yes |
| Federated queries | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best RDF Databases. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Corese scores higher on our published basis.