Brakeman vs Codacy
| Brakeman | Codacy | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | — | $1.50/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | — | extension, Web |
| IDE support | Yes | Yes |
| Custom rules | Yes | Yes |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Paid from | — | 18 /user/mo |
| Language support | — | Apex, AsyncAPI, AWS CloudFormation, Azure Resource Manager Templates, C, C++, C#, CoffeeScript, Crystal, CSS, Dart, Dockerfile, Elixir, GitHub Actions, Go, Groovy, Helm, Java, OpenAPI, PHP, PL/SQL, PostgreSQL, PowerShell, Python, Ruby, Rust, Sass, Scala, Serverless Framework, Shell, Swift, SQL, Terraform, Transact-SQL, TypeScript, Unity, Velocity, Visual Basic, Visualforce, XML, XSL, YAML |
| Security analysis | — | Yes |
| CI/CD support | — | Yes |
| Deployment | — | cloud_only |
Both are listed in Best Static Analysis Tools. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Codacy scores higher on our published basis.