Black Duck SCA vs ZeroPath
| Black Duck SCA | ZeroPath | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | $1,000/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Supported ecosystems | BitBake, Cargo, Carthage, CocoaPods, Conan, Conda, CPAN, CRAN, Dart, Go, Gradle, Hex, Ivy, Lerna, Maven, npm, NuGet, Packagist, PEAR, pip, pnpm, Poetry, RubyGems, SBT, Setuptools, Swift, Yarn, Xcode, OPAM, UV, Rush | — |
| SBOM generation | Yes | — |
| Reachability analysis | Yes | — |
| Pull request scanning | Yes | — |
| Deployment options | hybrid | — |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Paid from | — | 60 /user/mo |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Black Duck SCA scores higher on our published basis.