beecrowd vs Edabit
| beecrowd | Edabit | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Web | Web |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Primary use | practice | practice |
| Languages supported | Python, Ruby, C#, Scala, Lua, JavaScript, C, Kotlin, C++, Haskell, OCaml, Pascal, Java, Dart, R, PHP, Swift, Clojure, Rust, Elixir, SQL | C#, C++, Java, JavaScript, PHP, Python, Ruby, Swift |
| Custom challenges | Yes | — |
| Company assessments | Yes | — |
| Problem library size | — | 17,000 problems |
| Solution explanations | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Coding Challenge Platforms. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Edabit scores higher on our published basis.