BCC vs KubeSense
| BCC | KubeSense | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, self-hosted | Web, Linux |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment model | self-hosted | self-hosted |
| Network visibility | Yes | Yes |
| Application tracing | Yes | Yes |
| Kernel profiling | Yes | No |
| Supported operating systems | Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, Arch, Gentoo, openSUSE, RHEL, Amazon Linux, Alpine Linux, and WSL | Linux; CentOS 7.3+; Debian 10+; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8+; Ubuntu 16.04+ |
| Paid from | — | 20 /mo |
| Kubernetes support | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best eBPF Observability Tools. On Samsung Mobile US Press, BCC scores higher on our published basis.