Automic Continuous Delivery Automation vs Spinnaker
Automic Continuous Delivery Automation
5.1 #157 in Project Management Software
About Automic Continuous Delivery Automation| Automic Continuous Delivery Automation | Spinnaker | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, self-hosted, Web | api, self-hosted, Web |
| Deployment targets | Application deployment endpoints linked to operating-system agents; broad support from microservices to mainframe | AWS EC2, Kubernetes, Google Compute Engine, Google Kubernetes Engine, Google App Engine, Microsoft Azure, OpenStack, Cloud Foundry, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure |
| Deployment rollback | Yes | Yes |
| Approval gates | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hosted option | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment audit log | Yes | Yes |
| Rollout strategies | — | blue_green |
Both are listed in Best Deployment Automation Software, Best Continuous Delivery Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Spinnaker scores higher on our published basis.