ArcMutate vs PIT
| ArcMutate | PIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | $8/mo | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Supported languages | Java, Kotlin, Groovy | Java and JVM bytecode |
| Test frameworks | JUnit 4, JUnit 5, Spring Test, Mockito, MockK, Robolectric | JUnit 3, JUnit 4, TestNG; JUnit 5 via plugin |
| Incremental analysis | Yes | Yes |
| Parallel execution | Yes | Yes |
| Surviving mutant reports | Yes | Yes |
| Mutation quality gate | Yes | Yes |
| Mutation operators | Extended, extreme, chained calls, varargs, one-less-parameter, remove distinct/filter/limit/skip/sorted, predicate operators, field writes, parameter swaps, stream match swaps, reactive return and mapping operators, Groovy boundary and conditional operators, Spring annotation operators | Conditionals Boundary, Increments, Invert Negatives, Math, Negate Conditionals, Void Method Calls, Empty Returns, False Returns, True Returns, Null Returns, Primitive Returns, Remove Conditionals, Inline Constant, Constructor Calls, Non-Void Method Calls, Remove Increments, Argument Propagation, Big Integer, Member Variable, Naked Receiver, Negation, Arithmetic Operator Replacement, Arithmetic Ope |
Both are listed in Best Mutation Testing Tools. On Samsung Mobile US Press, ArcMutate scores higher on our published basis.