Apache Pulsar vs Buf Schema Registry
| Apache Pulsar | Buf Schema Registry | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | Free | $0.50/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows | api, self-hosted, Web |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | — | 0.5 /mo |
| Schema formats | — | Protobuf |
| Compatibility modes | — | FILE, PACKAGE, WIRE, WIRE_JSON |
| Validation scope | — | api |
| Deployment options | — | hybrid |
| Approval workflows | — | Yes |
| Git synchronization | — | No |
Both are listed in Best Schema Registry Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Buf Schema Registry scores higher on our published basis.