Anteon vs KubeSense
| Anteon | KubeSense | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | $99/mo | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web | Web, Linux |
| Paid from | 99 /mo | 20 /mo |
| Deployment model | hybrid | self-hosted |
| Kubernetes support | Yes | Yes |
| Network visibility | Yes | Yes |
| Application tracing | Yes | Yes |
| Kernel profiling | No | No |
| Supported operating systems | Linux (Ubuntu 20.04+, Debian 10, CentOS 8+) and macOS 10.15+; Windows not supported | Linux; CentOS 7.3+; Debian 10+; Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8+; Ubuntu 16.04+ |
| Free plan | — | No |
Both are listed in Best eBPF Observability Tools. On Samsung Mobile US Press, KubeSense scores higher on our published basis.