Anchore Enterprise vs ComplyVigilance SCA
| Anchore Enterprise | ComplyVigilance SCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | — | €10/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, self-hosted, Web | api, self-hosted, Web |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Supported ecosystems | RPM, DEB, APK, ALPM, Portage, Microsoft KB patches, C/C++, Dart, .NET, Elixir, Erlang, Go, Haskell, Java, JavaScript, Jenkins Plugins, Lua, Nix, Objective-C, OCaml, PHP, Python, R, Ruby, Rust, Swift, SWI-Prolog, Bitnami, GitHub Actions, Homebrew, Terraform, WordPress plugins | npm, yarn, pip, PyPI, Poetry, Maven, Gradle, NuGet, Cargo, Go Modules, vcpkg, Conan, Pkg.jl, Hardhat, Truffle, Foundry, Docker Hub, OCI registries; C, C++, C#, Java, Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, Go, Rust, Solidity, Julia |
| SBOM generation | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment options | — | cloud |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, ComplyVigilance SCA scores higher on our published basis.