AmorphousDiskMark vs UL Procyon
| AmorphousDiskMark | UL Procyon | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | macOS | Windows, macOS, Android |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Workload areas | sequential read/write; random read/write; storage throughput; IOPS | office productivity, photo editing, video editing, battery life, AI computer vision, AI image generation, AI text generation, multitasking and web browsing |
| Operating systems | macOS 10.9 or later | Windows, macOS, Android |
| Custom test profiles | Yes | Yes |
| Comparison database | — | Yes |
| Result export formats | — | XML, PDF, CSV, Procyon result file |
| CLI or automation | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best PC Benchmark Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, UL Procyon scores higher on our published basis.