AmorphousDiskMark vs CrystalDiskMark
| AmorphousDiskMark | CrystalDiskMark | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | macOS | Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Workload areas | sequential read/write; random read/write; storage throughput; IOPS | Sequential, random, read, write, mixed disk performance |
| Operating systems | macOS 10.9 or later | Windows XP/Vista/7/8/8.1/10/11; Windows Server 2003/2008/2012/2016/2019/2022/2025 |
| Custom test profiles | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | — | 9.99 one-time |
| Result export formats | — | UTF-16LE text with BOM, PNG, JPEG, BMP |
Both are listed in Best PC Benchmark Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, CrystalDiskMark scores higher on our published basis.