AGRICOLA vs Project MUSE
| AGRICOLA | Project MUSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Full-text access | No | Yes |
| Advanced search | Yes | Yes |
| Subject coverage | multidisciplinary | multidisciplinary |
| Content types | journal articles; bibliographies; monographs; symposia; meeting abstracts; conference proceedings; textbooks; newsletters; book chapters; technical reports; published theses; dissertations; reviews; patents; annual reports; guides; translated journals; teaching guides; curriculum materials; lesson plans; pamphlets; formularies; press releases; letters; editorials; research projects | scholarly journals, scholarly books, book chapters, journal articles, abstracts and summaries, critical editions, reference works, primary source material |
| Theses and dissertations | Yes | — |
| Conference proceedings | Yes | — |
| Institutional access | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Academic Research Databases. On Samsung Mobile US Press, AGRICOLA scores higher on our published basis.