Acrolinx vs Congree Authoring Server
| Acrolinx | Congree Authoring Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | — | Web, Windows |
| Custom style guide | Yes | Yes |
| Terminology management | Yes | Yes |
| Brand voice rules | Yes | — |
| Editor support | Adobe FrameMaker, Arbortext Editor, Figma, Google Docs, Google Sheets, Google Slides, MadCap Flare, Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Outlook, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Word, Oxygen XML Author, Oxygen XML Editor, Oxygen XML Web Author, Visual Studio Code, XMetaL | Microsoft Word, browser applications, desktop authoring applications, XML editors, content management systems |
| Team workflow | Yes | — |
| API access | Yes | Yes |
| Rule action | — | suggest |
Both are listed in Best Writing Style Checkers. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Acrolinx scores higher on our published basis.