PhishEye

Overview

PhishEye is a web and API service for finding phishing, lookalike domains and other forms of brand impersonation, with tools to coordinate takedowns. It is best suited to security, fraud and brand teams that need monitoring tied to a response workflow, including MSPs managing client workspaces. The one-time free scan is useful for an initial check, but ongoing monitoring and takedown cases require a paid plan.

Key features

PhishEye draws on domain, DNS, certificate, hosting, redirect and live-page signals to identify active brand impersonation. That breadth makes it more relevant to teams investigating suspicious sites than a tool focused only on domain-name matches. Monitoring spans domains, social, ads, search and app stores; the service also offers dark web monitoring, credential leak alerts and impersonation monitoring.

Paid plans include automated takedown workflows through GoDaddy and Cloudflare abuse APIs. This gives teams a path from finding a threat to submitting a response, but the providers may reject reports or take an unspecified time to act. Plans also list STIX 2.1 / TAXII 2.1 threat-feed export. Pro adds nine SIEM/SOAR connectors—Slack, Teams, Splunk, Sumo, Sentinel, Defender, ThreatConnect, Tines and XSOAR—so it is the more suitable tier for teams that need to route findings into existing security workflows.

Security controls include TLS 1.2 or higher for web and API connections, encryption at rest for supported primary data stores, and MFA for administrative and production-facing accounts. PhishEye says it may pursue formal certifications such as SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 as demand and company scale require; organizations that require one of those certifications should weigh that carefully. Support aims to cover UK business hours. Pro includes priority email support, while Business adds dedicated support and an SLA.

Pricing

The Free plan costs 0.00 USD per free and provides one monitored brand, one single-run typosquat scan and 30-day scan history, with no takedown cases or requests. It is a useful initial check, not a monitoring plan: teams needing repeat scans, incident handling or takedowns must move to a paid tier.

Starter has custom pricing and covers one monitored brand, daily typosquat scans, 10 takedown cases and 60-day scan history. It suits a single-brand team that needs ongoing scanning and a modest case allowance, but it does not offer the multi-brand or workspace capacity of higher plans.

Pro also has custom pricing. It raises coverage to three monitored brands and 50 takedown cases, extends scan history to 90 days, and supports up to five child workspaces and five team members. Its connectors and priority email support make it a more capable option for teams integrating monitoring into security operations or managing several clients.

Business has custom pricing and includes 10 monitored brands, unlimited takedown cases, one-year scan history, up to 25 child workspaces, dedicated support and an SLA. It is the clearest fit for larger operations or MSPs with many client environments; the tradeoff is that even this tier caps monitored brands at 10.

Platforms

PhishEye is available on web and through an API. The API option supports teams incorporating the service into their own workflows, while the web interface offers a direct route for teams managing monitoring and cases.

Who it's for

PhishEye is aimed at security, fraud and brand teams that want brand-threat monitoring connected to takedown handling and threat-feed export. Child workspaces in Pro and Business make it relevant to MSPs separating client work. It is a weaker fit for a buyer seeking guaranteed removal, a substantial no-cost monitoring service, or a vendor already holding a required formal certification.

Pros and cons

• Pros: Multiple technical signals and monitoring across domains, social, ads, search and app stores address more than typosquatted domains alone.
• Pros: Paid takedown workflows, threat-feed export and, at Pro, nine SIEM/SOAR connectors can connect detection to existing response processes.
• Pros: Pro and Business include child workspaces, providing explicit capacity for MSP-style client management.
• Cons: Free is restricted to one single-run scan on one brand and provides no takedown requests, so it cannot serve as ongoing protection.
• Cons: Takedowns depend on third parties accepting reports and acting; submission does not guarantee removal or a response time.
• Cons: Paid plan prices are custom, and formal certifications such as SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 may be pursued rather than established commitments.

Alternatives

Consider SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence Platform if a published monthly price for dark web monitoring matters: its Essential plan is 600.00 USD per month (billed Monthly) for one domain and one seat, while its Business plan is 1145.00 USD per month. Choose Allure Brand Protection when flat-rate pricing without per-incident fees or takedown limits is the priority; coverage varies by plan and organization needs.

Constella Hunter+ is another paid alternative with pricing available by demo request. Flare may suit a buyer who wants to start with a free 14-day trial; it requires an identity verification call and is scoped to the customer's domain. For a tailored package, consider ZeroFox Attack Surface Intelligence, which uses quote-based pricing.

Fortra Data Security Posture Management is a paid option with no free plan or trial; its Advanced plan targets mid-sized or evolving security environments and includes enhanced support and required Quick Start Implementation. Group-IB Attack Surface Management offers a free trial, with Standard pricing based on the total number of confirmed external assets. KELA Platform offers a 30-day free trial with no commitment or payment details required, as well as a Cloud Attack Surface Management plan at 65000.00 USD per year on a 12-month contract.

Explore more options in Digital Risk Protection Software and Dark Web Monitoring Services.

Verdict

PhishEye is a sensible choice for security, fraud and brand teams—and MSPs—that need multi-signal brand monitoring connected to takedown workflows, especially when feed export or Pro's integrations matter. Its main limitation is the gap between submitting a takedown and securing action from a third party, compounded by custom pricing for paid plans. Choose it for the combined monitoring and response workflow; look elsewhere if guaranteed removals, established formal certifications or a clearly priced paid tier are essential.