Open-source distributed graph database designed to query complex data with millisecond response times.
- Home
- Developer Tools
- Graph Databases
Best Graph Databases 2026
This list covers graph database tools and the options they publish for pricing, deployment, query languages, transactions, graph algorithms, vector search and storage.
Use it to compare free plans, trials, open-source availability and platform support. No scoring basis is published, so read the listed figures and terms for the tool you are considering.
ArcadeDB
Open-source graph database available as a self-hosted service with a free plan.
WebWindowsMac+3Memgraph
In-memory graph database and platform for graph computations on streaming data.
WebWindowsMac+3Sparksee
Embeddable graph database for representing and analyzing complex relationships from an application process.
AndroidiPhone & iPadWindows+4TigerGraph
Graph database for real-time analytics on connected data using Native Parallel Graph and GSQL.
WebLinuxAPI+1Horizontally scalable semantic system for knowledge graphs and complex-data integration.
Embedded columnar database for analytical and agentic graph applications, queried with Cypher.
Modular Java framework for RDF parsing, storage, SPARQL 1.1 and reasoning.
Open-source decentralized graph database and data protocol with real-time peer synchronization.
Open-source NoSQL DBMS that combines graph and document models.
Neo4j suits developers and organizations working with connected data who need graph querying and deployment choices.
TypeDB is a structured hypergraph store with schema-checked TypeQL for Linux, macOS, Windows and web.
Graph system for database storage, graph computing and GraphRAG through Gremlin, Cypher and REST.
RDF/SPARQL database with forward-chaining inference, GraphRAG and LangChain integration.
InfiniteGraph provides graph storage and analytics with deep-link, complex graph and relational queries on Linux or Windows.
TuGraph supports real-time queries and offline analytics for large-scale graph analysis, with an integrated visual platform.
Open-source graph database for RDF and linked data with SQL, NoSQL and key-value backends.
TerminusDB stores JSON documents in a schema-enforced graph with Git-like version control and HTTP, GraphQL and WOQL queries.
HyperGraphDB is an embedded database library using generalized hypergraphs whose edges can contain other edges.
Distributed graph database that runs across multi-machine clusters with ACID or eventually consistent transactions.
WhisperGraph is a cloud graph engine using Cypher, with shared Community, Starter and Professional plans.
Before you choose
Check the way you can start
Look for a free plan, a free trial or an open-source license before committing. Sparksee, LadybugDB, GUN, SeKejap and AllegroGraph list free plans; Eclipse RDF4J and Apache HugeGraph list open-source terms.
Pricing can change by product and deployment. Memgraph lists a free plan and a 30-day trial. FalkorDB lists a free plan and paid service from $73 per month.
Match deployment to your environment
Compare support for Linux, APIs, self-hosted setups, web access, macOS and Windows. Platform availability differs across tools, so check the platform column against the systems you need.
A self-hosted option can matter when you control the deployment. An API or web option may fit a service that runs outside a local workstation.
Review language and transaction needs
Use the query-language field to check whether a tool fits the syntax your team plans to use. The comparison also lists ACID transaction support, which helps you examine how a product handles transactional work.
Neo4j, Memgraph, ArcadeDB and Aerospike Database are examples of named products on the list; compare their published fields rather than assuming they work alike.
Compare graph and vector features
Check the graph-algorithm and vector-search fields when connected-data analysis or similarity search is part of the workload. Included storage can affect how you plan a deployment.
Read the published storage and feature entries for the specific tool. Product names alone do not establish support for a given workload.