- Home
- Developer Tools
- eBPF Observability Tools
Best eBPF Observability Tools 2026
eBPF observability tools are for examining activity across applications, kernels, and networks. Compare application tracing, kernel profiling, and network visibility to focus on the signals relevant to your work. Kubernetes support, deployment model, and supported operating systems help you assess whether the listed setup options align with your environment. Free plans and paid-from pricing provide cost details to weigh as well. DeepFlow, bpftrace, and Grafana k6 are among the named tools, alongside groundcover, Kubeshark, BCC, Coroot, and Inspektor Gadget. Consider which layers you need to observe, then compare the stated capabilities and platform details against your infrastructure.
Kubeshark
Kubeshark is aimed at SREs, network engineers, AI assistants, and agents working on root-cause analysis, incident response, and network reliability.
WebWindowsMac+3groundcover
groundcover suits teams monitoring production environments that want telemetry collection through an eBPF sensor and a choice of cloud-managed or on-premises deployment.
WebLinuxSelf-hostedKubeSense
WebLinuxAPI+1Metoro Kubernetes Profiling
It suits teams profiling Kubernetes workloads that want runtime views alongside application traces and deployment context.
WebLinuxAPI+1DeepFlow may suit teams monitoring cloud infrastructure and cloud-native applications that need tracing, profiling, and protocol parsing.
Odigos suits engineers, AI agents, and security teams investigating production behavior, containing attacks, or improving code.
Kindling suits fiction writers who plan, including plotters, pantsers, and writers between those approaches.
Pixie suits developers who need observability and debugging tools for supported Kubernetes environments.
Inspektor Gadget suits operators and developers inspecting Linux hosts or Kubernetes clusters with eBPF-based tools.
Parca suits teams that want to run their own continuous profiler and examine profiles across processes or code versions.
Qpoint suits individuals, small teams, IT operations, security teams, and organizations governing AI agents across endpoints or hosted environments.
Gyeeta suits teams running self-hosted Linux infrastructure that need TCP service and process visibility without instrumenting applications.
bpftrace suits Linux users who need kernel or user-space tracing for debugging or production tracing.
Caretta suits operators who want a self-hosted visual view of service networking in Kubernetes and can meet its Linux kernel and CO-RE requirements.
Tetragon suits security teams monitoring Linux, container, and Kubernetes workloads, including process, file, privilege, and network activity.
Tracee may suit teams seeking Linux runtime security monitoring, compliance monitoring, troubleshooting, or forensic investigation.
Hubble suits teams running Kubernetes workloads that need network-flow and security visibility across nodes or clusters.