- Home
- Code review software
- ReviewSensei
On the recordRead 11 Oct 202624 facts
ReviewSensei
On the record
- Alpha status
- The project identifies itself as alpha software and says capabilities, defaults, and distribution channels evolve.reviewsensei.dev · read 11 Oct 2026
- Controls
- Separate switches govern analysis, comment publication, automatic approval or request changes, learning, conversations, and artifact retention.reviewsensei.dev · read 11 Oct 2026
- Coverage
- Opt-in large-change orchestration reports per-path outcomes such as reviewed, partially reviewed, excluded, unsupported, or budget exhausted.reviewsensei.dev · read 11 Oct 2026
- Data handling
- The core does not persist raw prompts or provider responses; published comments, artifacts, approved learnings, and provider-side copies have separate retention locations.reviewsensei.dev · read 11 Oct 2026
- Data persistence
- The core engine does not persist raw prompts or raw provider responses; review results, GitHub comments, artifacts, and approved learnings have separate retention locations.reviewsensei.dev · read 11 Oct 2026
- Diagnostics
- The doctor and plan commands preview configuration, stages, budgets, and skip reasons without provider calls or writes.reviewsensei.dev · read 11 Oct 2026
- Evidence limitation
- Schema and diff-location validation do not prove that a finding is correct or that review coverage is complete, and legacy evidence policy is the default.reviewsensei.dev · read 11 Oct 2026
- Execution
- Review logic runs in the user's GitHub Actions environment, self-hosted runner, or local CLI environment.reviewsensei.dev · read 11 Oct 2026
- Finding lifecycle
- Incremental reviews use stable fingerprints to label findings new, still present, fixed, outdated, or uncertain.reviewsensei.dev · read 11 Oct 2026
- Finding tracking
- Incremental reviews use stable fingerprints to track findings through states including new, still present, fixed, outdated, and uncertain.reviewsensei.dev · read 11 Oct 2026
- Installation
- The site describes three installation routes: App-assisted GitHub reviews, manual GitHub Actions setup, and local CLI.reviewsensei.dev · read 11 Oct 2026
- Integrations
- The site offers a GitHub App, GitHub Action, and CLI, and its provider matrix lists Ollama, Ollama Cloud, OpenAI-compatible, and OpenRouter support with different workflow availability.reviewsensei.dev · read 11 Oct 2026
- Learning
- Proposed repository learnings can become draft pull requests and require maintainer approval before future selection for matching paths.reviewsensei.dev · read 11 Oct 2026
- Model providers
- The getting-started page lists local Ollama, Ollama Cloud, OpenRouter, and an OpenAI-compatible CLI option.reviewsensei.dev · read 11 Oct 2026
- Provider costs
- Users provision and pay for model inference, GitHub Actions minutes, and self-hosted runner capacity.reviewsensei.dev · read 11 Oct 2026
- Provider data limits
- ReviewSensei says it does not guarantee provider-side retention, training, residency, or deletion practices.reviewsensei.dev · read 11 Oct 2026
- Publication controls
- Comment publication defaults to off, and separate settings control review policy, learning, conversations, and artifact retention.reviewsensei.dev · read 11 Oct 2026
- Purpose
- ReviewSensei is open-source alpha software for AI code review of pull requests using repository-owned knowledge and configurable review stages.reviewsensei.dev · read 11 Oct 2026