RhodeCode Enterprise manages and reviews Mercurial, Git, and Subversion repositories.
- Home
- Developer Tools
- Code review software
Best Code Review Software 2026
Code review software helps teams inspect proposed code, flag issues and manage review work. This guide helps developers and engineering leads compare tools for hosted or self-managed workflows.
Compare free plans, trials, code hosts, automated analysis, AI review, custom rules, security analysis, review analytics, self-hosting and the starting paid price. The page does not publish a ranking basis, so use these fields to build your shortlist.
Bito
Bito provides code review tools for GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, including self-managed hosts.
WebWindowsMac+3CodeRabbit
CodeRabbit is code review software for cloud or self-hosted use with Git providers and team tools.
WebWindowsMac+4Cubic
It suits GitHub teams wanting AI-assisted pull-request review, security analysis, custom rules, and automated workflows.
WebWindowsMac+2Review Board
Review Board is code review software available in cloud or self-hosted deployments.
WebWindowsMac+3Ellipsis is code review software available through an API, web app, and self-hosted Linux or Mac systems.
Sourcery is code review software with cloud, self-hosted, and desktop options.
Gerrit offers self-hosted code review through web, Linux, macOS, Windows and APIs, with Jenkins integrations.
Graphite may suit development teams using GitHub that want pull request organization, AI review assistance or a merge queue.
PullFlow syncs identities and code review activity between GitHub, Slack, and VS Code.
Reviewdog filters local linter output against a diff and posts findings as code review comments.
Revue reviews staged changes or pull requests and posts verified findings as inline comments.
Octopus indexes codebases and posts severity-rated findings as inline pull request comments.
Review Assistant adds code review requests and replies to Visual Studio without leaving the IDE.
Greptile is code review software available in cloud or self-hosted deployments.
Mesrai reviews pull requests for defects, security, speed, architecture, and team rules.
P4 Code Review lets contributors review Perforce P4 changes and provide feedback or approval.
Rami suits solo developers and small teams using GitHub whose code is increasingly written by AI agents.
Gitar is cloud code review software that integrates with Git providers and CI systems.
gitStream uses YAML configuration to automate pull request workflows and code review tasks.
PullApprove manages human code review with path-based scopes, reviewer assignments, and approval rules.
Code Review by Holycode analyzes code for performance and security issues and proposes fixes.
LiveReview prioritizes code changes by blast radius and review priority across commit and pull request workflows.
Before you choose
Start with access and cost
A free plan can let you evaluate a tool before paying. A free trial gives time-limited access instead; check the trial length and what remains available afterward.
Pricing varies by user, month or year. Sourcery lists paid plans from $12 per user each month, while CodeRabbit lists $24 per month with annual billing.
Match the hosting model
Web access suits teams that want a hosted workspace. Self-hosted options keep deployment under your control, while an API can connect review checks to internal systems.
Check platform support for web, self-hosted, API, Linux, macOS and Windows before you commit to a workflow.
Choose the review checks
Automated analysis can flag code issues without a manual pass. AI review adds machine-generated feedback, while custom review rules let a team define its own checks.
Security analysis and review analytics address different needs: one looks for security problems, and the other helps track review activity.
Confirm code-host fit
Code-host support determines where a tool can connect to repositories and pull requests. Verify that the hosts used by your team are supported before setup.
Compare host coverage alongside automated analysis and AI review so a feature match does not fail at the integration step.
Check openness and control
Open-source status matters if you need to inspect or change the software. Confirm the licence and deployment terms for the tool you are considering.
A self-hosted option can provide more control over deployment, but it may require infrastructure work from your team.